Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-08 | -- |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 7.58 ounces | -- |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, getting a 90.7 score against 81.6. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a much thinner and incredibly lighter phone than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version while Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10 version, so it provides some additional features.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a very superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a better number of pixels per inch of display, way more brightness, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a quite larger display.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a very superior storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots a lot better videos and photos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a larger camera aperture for better images and video in poorly lited situations, a way bigger back camera sensor, a way better video resolution and a camera with a way better resolution.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has a 3 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.