Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-09-08 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a global score of 81.6, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's general score of 77.8. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC design is a lot newer than Galaxy S5 Sport's, but it's incredibly heavier and a little bit thicker. These phones include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has the previous 10 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2.
The Galaxy S5 Sport's CPU is just as good as Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's processing unit, because although the Galaxy S5 Sport has a lower number of cores (although faster) and 4 GB less RAM, it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better amount of pixels in each inch of display.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that holds up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a camera in the back with a lot better resolution, a lot larger camera sensor capturing lot better quality pictures and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.