Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-09-08 | -- |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | -- |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has an overall score of 81.6, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active's 80.9 overall score. These phones have Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a more recent 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version. The Galaxy S6 Active has a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and an extra graphics processor.
The Galaxy S6 Active has a better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video quality, the same video frame rate and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a way larger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs and a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.