Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-08 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is slightly better than the Galaxy S7 Active, with an 81.6 score against 75.8. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC construction is newer and just a bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display, a little bit more brightness and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing pictures in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a superior storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5160mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.