Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-09-08 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a score of 81.6 against 80.1. Although the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC and Galaxy XCover FieldPro were only released with a couple of months difference, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is lighter and extremely thinner. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has 10 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little sharper display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel count per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera, a much higher video quality and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5160mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.