Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-08 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, getting a score of 88.5 against 81.6. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC were only released 7 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a lot thinner and somewhat lighter. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version while Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 2 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a just a bit lower amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a little worse 1080 x 2400px resolution, they both have a same size display.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a much better resolution camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.