Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-08 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, getting a score of 85.6 against 81.6. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's design is newer, lighter and much thinner than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10 version, so it provides the user some additional features.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a bit worse pixels density, they both have a screen of the same size. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with slightly more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking images and video in low light environments, it also counts with a much more megapixels back camera.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 56% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.