Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-08 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, having a global score of 92.3 against 81.6. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is somewhat lighter and way thinner than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, even though both were released only 1 months apart. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little worse screen density and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, they both have a screen with the same size.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a way more mega pixels back camera and a much larger sensor.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.