Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-08 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's 81.6 global score. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is noticeably heavier but much thinner than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and both were released with only a couple months difference. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has newer 11 version while Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10 version, giving some nice extra features and enhanced performance.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light images and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a bigger sensor which offers a higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.