Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-08 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, with a 90.6 score against 81.6. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a newer 11 version and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is newer and much thinner, but also notably heavier than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 6 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a quite greater quantity of pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger camera aperture for better images and video in low light environments and a camera in the back with a way better 64 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.