Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-08 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, getting an 82.9 score against 81.6. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is an older phone than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, but it's a little bit thinner and a little lighter anyway. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10, providing you lots of additional features and some performance improvements.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC both have extremely similar displays, because although the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a little bit smaller display, a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and less brightness, it also counts with a just a bit higher number of pixels in each inch of screen.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution and a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has greater battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.