Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 88.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2021-03-20 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 829.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 has a general score of 88.7, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro's overall score of 83.4. The Apple iPhone 12 design is extremely thinner and way lighter than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, although they were released only a couple months apart. The Apple iPhone 12 works with iOS 15.x OS, and Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with Android 11 OS.
The iPhone 12 counts with a superior performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has lesser cpu cores (but faster) and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The Apple iPhone 12 features a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1170 x 2532.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a superior storage to store more games and applications than iPhone 12, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro captures just a bit better photos and videos than Apple iPhone 12, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with much more MP.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 12, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 2815mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.