Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-20 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, getting an 84.2 score against 83.4. The Apple iPhone XS is an way older phone than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, but Apple managed to build it lighter and somewhat thinner. IPhone XS has a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has 2 less and slower processing cores and 2 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The iPhone XS has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels quantity per inch of screen and a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro takes clearer videos and photos than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality pictures and a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a very superior battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has a 5160mAh battery size against 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.