Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-20 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, having a overall score of 89 against 83.4. Google Pixel 5's body is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, although both of them were released with only 5 months difference. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a little faster processor than Google Pixel 5, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 5 features a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a quite greater pixel quantity per display inch. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 5160mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking pictures and video in low-light situations and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also counts with a lot higher resolution camera and a way larger sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.