Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-03-20 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a global score of 83.4, which is slightly better than LG V30S ThinQ's overall score of 82.5. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro's construction is incredibly newer than the LG V30S ThinQ's, although it is notably thicker and a lot heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has the previous 11 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better display density. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a bit better hardware performance than LG V30S ThinQ. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.