Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-20 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro's 83.4 general score. Samsung Galaxy A50 is an notably older cellphone than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, but Samsung was able to make it a lot lighter and thinner anyway. Galaxy A50 features a display that is very similar to the screen in Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although the Galaxy A50 has a bit smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little greater pixel density.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a little bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A50, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing photos and video in low light environments, it also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels, a much higher (4K) video quality and a lot larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has longer battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.