Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-20 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro's global score of 83.4. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Galaxy A51's design is thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, although it was released just 15 months before.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro and the Galaxy A51 both feature really similar displays, because although the Galaxy A51 has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a just a little greater display pixel density.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a slightly better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A51 takes clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light images, they both have the same (4K) video definition, a 0.5 inches sensor, the same resolution camera in the back and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.