Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-20 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a bit better than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, getting a general score of 91.1 against 83.4. The Samsung Galaxy A52s construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, even when they were released only a couple months apart. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 11 OS.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52s. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores. Galaxy A52s counts with a display that's very similar to the display in Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although the Galaxy A52s has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better amount of pixels in each screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features as much storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5160mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Galaxy A52s takes much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A52s also has a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures and a way better 64 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.