Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-20 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro's 83.4 score. These devices include the same Android 11 OS, so both should count with very similar operating system features. Samsung Galaxy F62 is a a little bit heavier cellphone than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, but they have the same thickness.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has a greater number of cores. Galaxy F62 has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro. They have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a same size screen and the same pixels density.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy F62 both have extremely similar storage for applications, games, photos and videos, they have exactly the same internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 features a very superior battery duration than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 5160mAh.
Samsung Galaxy F62 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a back facing camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a larger back camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.