Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-20 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, having a 97.6 score against 83.4. Despite of the fact Galaxy Fold is older and a lot heavier than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, it's construction is still extremely thinner. Both devices we compare here have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has Android 11.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photos or videos in poorly lited situations and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Galaxy Fold has a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.