Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-20 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with an 83.4 score against 80.4. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro construction is notably newer, but way heavier and somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel amount per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking photographs or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor and a camera with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.