Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-20 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is much better than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, with a general score of 93.6 against 83.4. The Galaxy S10 5G design is just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released just a little over a year before. Both devices we compare here have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should provide you identical operating system features.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy S10 5G and Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro feature similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy S10 5G has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera and a way larger camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a little better battery duration than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 5160mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.