Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-03-20 | -- |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | -- |
| Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a score of 83.4, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S6 Active's global score of 80.9. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a more recent 11 version and Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0, giving lots of additional features and performance enhancements.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bit CPU and an additional graphics processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has an incredibly better display than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels number per inch of screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has a bigger aperture to take better low light images and video, a back facing camera with much more megapixels and a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 5160mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.