Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-20 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a score of 83.4, which is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's global score of 75.8. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro's body is way newer and a little thinner, but also heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixel count per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also counts with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.