Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-03-20 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a general score of 83.4, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's general score of 80.1. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro design is newer, lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the screen. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a little better battery duration than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 15% greater battery size.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting images and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality, a back facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.