Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-20 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, having a global score of 88.5 against 83.4. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is an older cellphone than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, but it's lighter and a lot thinner anyway. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version while Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has Android 11, so it gives lots of additional features and performance optimizations.
Galaxy Z Flip features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a little bit higher display pixels density. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back and a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a much better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.