Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-20 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is better than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro's 83.4 global score. These devices work with the same Android 11 operating system, so both should provide the user all the same operating system features. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's design is noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, even when they were only released 8 months apart.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little better performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a just a bit higher display density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures and a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.