Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-20 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, getting a general score of 94.6 against 83.4. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro were released only a couple of months apart, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is much thinner but also way heavier than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro. Both devices we are comparing have the same Android 11 OS, so they should count with the same OS features.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a display that's just as good as the display in Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and a little bigger screen.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro takes slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier sensor taking less light and duller colors and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also counts with a camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5160mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.