Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-06-23 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue. Black and Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 407 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 8100 SM8250- (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC6 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5080mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Xiaomi Poco X4 GT, with a 92.3 score against 74.1. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is older than the Xiaomi Poco X4 GT, it's design is a little lighter and somewhat thinner. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version while Xiaomi Poco X4 GT has Android 12 version.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a really superior processing power than Xiaomi Poco X4 GT. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 8 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X4 GT, because it has a little bigger display, a quite higher display pixel density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X4 GT, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Poco X4 GT, because although it has a way worse resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures in low light environments and a way larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5080mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.