Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-03-23 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Laser Black, Laser Blue and POCO Yellow | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 696 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is slightly better than Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G's 76.7 score. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy A50 is incredibly older than the Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G, it's construction is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter. Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a just a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
The Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G has a bit bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A50, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A50 counts with a much powerful processing unit than Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G has longer battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.