Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-03-23 | -- |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 7.23 ounces | -- |
| Laser Black, Laser Blue and POCO Yellow | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 696 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.12 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a bit better than Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G, having an 82.6 score against 76.7. The Samsung Galaxy S25 construction is notably lighter and notably thinner than the Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S25 has a more recent 14 version and Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy S25 has a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S25 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy S25 has a slightly better screen than Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixel count per inch in the display and much more brightness.
Galaxy S25 has a very superior camera than Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G, because although it has a camera with a lot lower 50 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos. Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G has a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G features greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.