Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-03-23 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Laser Black, Laser Blue and POCO Yellow | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 696 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G, having a global score of 94.6 against 76.7. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G has Android 12 version. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is thinner than the Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G, but it is way heavier and was released just 18 months before.
The Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a lot better hardware performance than Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G features a greater storage for applications and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G, because although it has a much less megapixels camera in the back, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low light images and video.
Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G features just a little better battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.