Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-07 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone X is way better than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, with an 88.1 score against 71.7. IPhone X's construction is newer and somewhat thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. The Apple iPhone X features a better performance than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
IPhone X has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a bigger display, a little bit greater screen density and a little bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution. The Apple iPhone X captures much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a less mega-pixels back camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures.
IPhone X counts with a very superior storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime counts with a really longer battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 51 percent more battery size.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone X, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.