Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-07 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, getting a overall score of 84.2 against 71.7. The Apple iPhone XS is a newer and somewhat thinner device than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, although it's also heavier. IPhone XS features a greater performance than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has less CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with more RAM and a 64-bits processing unit.
The iPhone XS has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution, a bigger display and a quite better screen pixels density. Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone XS, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 128 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime counts with a really longer battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has a 54% greater battery capacity. The Apple iPhone XS shoots much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a lesser MP resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture and a way higher video resolution.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone XS, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.