Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-07 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gray and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is better than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, getting a general score of 80.2 against 71.7. Even when Google Pixel and the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime were released only 1 months apart, Google Pixel is a bit thinner and a little lighter. The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime features a little bit better performance than Google Pixel, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores (although slower).
Google Pixel features a screen that's just as good as Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime's screen, they have a greater amount of pixels per inch of display, an equal 1080 x 1920 resolution and a same size screen. The Google Pixel counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel features a superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a lesser MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited environments and a lot higher video quality. The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Google Pixel, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.