Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime's general score of 71.7. The Google Pixel 3 is a newer phone, and it's also just a bit lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. Google Pixel 3 features a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a little bit larger display. The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime features a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB.
The Google Pixel 3 features a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a less MP resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher video quality and a bigger camera aperture for better low light images and videos. Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime features a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3 costs more than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.