Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-07 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is better than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, getting a score of 81.9 against 71.7. Google Pixel 4's design is incredibly newer and a little bit thinner, but also a little bit heavier than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. The Google Pixel 4 features a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 features a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a just a little higher pixel amount in each inch of display, a bit bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2280. The Google Pixel 4 takes much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a worse 12.2 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video definition and a way bigger aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited environments.
Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has a little bit better memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 128 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.