Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-07 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has an overall score of 82.9, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime's overall score of 71.7. The Google Pixel 4 XL design is newer and a little thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a little better display density, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a larger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a less mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a much larger aperture to take better low-light photography and video and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality. The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime features just a little bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.