Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-07 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, having a general score of 89 against 71.7. Google Pixel 5's body is extremely newer, a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. Google Pixel 5 and Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime have quite similar displays, because although the Google Pixel 5 has a little lower display density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a larger display.
The Google Pixel 5 features a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 5 features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Google Pixel 5's battery life is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime one, although the Google Pixel 5 has just 4080mAh battery capacity. Google Pixel 5 has a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a lower 12.2 megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a way larger diafragm aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments and a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel 5, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.