Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.0 |
| 2016-11-07 | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Metal | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 441 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, getting a 77.7 score against 71.7. Although it's the best phone we are comparing, the HTC One M9 design is older, a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version while Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The HTC One M9 features a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM amount, the HTC One M9 also has a 64-bits CPU and a graphics processing unit. The HTC One M9 has a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. Both of them have exactly the same resolution of 1920 x 1080, a same size screen and the same display density.
HTC One M9's storage to install games and applications is very similar to the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime one, they have a SD card slot that holds up to 128 GB and the same 32 GB internal memory. The HTC One M9 features a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the HTC One M9 also has a much better (4K) video resolution and a back camera with a way better resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime features a superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
The HTC One M9 costs more than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.