Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-11-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, with a general score of 81.2 against 71.7. The LG V40 ThinQ design is newer and somewhat thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V40 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
LG V40 ThinQ features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a much better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution, a quite higher screen density and a bigger display.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a lesser megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a lot larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. LG V40 ThinQ features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has superior battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4100mAh battery size.
The LG V40 ThinQ costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.