Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-11-07 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is way better than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, having an 87.1 score against 71.7. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is notably newer and a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime's, although it's also incredibly heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has older 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime counts with a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a quite lower number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a much bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with much more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a camera with way more megapixels, a much bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in low light situations and a way higher video definition.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a 10 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.