Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-11-07 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 133.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is a lot better than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, getting an 87 score against 71.7. These devices include Android operating system, but Motorola razr (2020) has older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Motorola razr (2020) construction is newer and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime's, but it's also heavier.
Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has a bit sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a bit higher quantity of pixels per screen inch. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola razr (2020) shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a much higher resolution back facing camera, a way bigger diafragm aperture for better images and video in low light environments and a lot higher video resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime features a very superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4100mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.