Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-07 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Plastic |
| $ 133.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is a lot better than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime's score of 71.7. The Galaxy A52 body is incredibly newer and just a bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a way smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy A52 has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 96 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has just a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a 10 percent more battery size. Galaxy A52 features a very superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light environments, a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.