Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-11-07 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, with a general score of 91.3 against 71.7. Even though the Galaxy A52 5G is somewhat heavier than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, it's just a bit thinner and also noticeably newer. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixel amount per display inch. Galaxy A52 5G has a much greater memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has 3 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a back camera with lot more megapixels, a way higher 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger camera aperture for better low light images and video.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit superior battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.