Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-11-07 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, getting a overall score of 76.9 against 71.7. The Samsung Galaxy A70 is a extremely newer and somewhat thinner device than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, but it is also heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A70 has the older 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime features just a bit better display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a really smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better count of pixels in each display inch. Galaxy A70 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A70 also has 3 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime shoots way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting images and video in poorly lited environments, they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A70 features just a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a 10% bigger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy A70 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A70, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.