Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-07 | 2015-08-21 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Metal | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a score of 80.2, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime's 71.7 overall score. Samsung Galaxy Note5's body is somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, although it's a little bit heavier and was released a little bit further than a year before. Galaxy Note5 has a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a little bigger screen, a little better screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Galaxy Note5 counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note5 also has 1 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime features a little bit better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note5, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has a very superior battery life than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 37 percent larger battery size. Samsung Galaxy Note5 counts with a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in low light situations, a lot better video quality and a higher 16 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.