Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-07 | 2016-08-02 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note7 is better than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, with a 79.5 score against 71.7. Although the Galaxy Note7 and Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime were released only 3 months apart, Galaxy Note7's body is just a little heavier but thinner than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more cores.
The Galaxy Note7 features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a quite bigger display, a just a little better screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Galaxy Note7 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a lot higher video definition and a lot larger camera aperture.
The Galaxy Note7 counts with much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 256 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has better battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.