Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-11-07 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is a lot better than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, having a 94.8 score against 71.7. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 has an older 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Samsung Galaxy S20 design is way newer and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime's, although it is just a bit heavier.
Galaxy S20 features a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has 9 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S20 counts with a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a higher pixel count per inch in the display, a larger display and a lot higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a way better camera than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos. The Galaxy S20 features a much better storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime features a little better battery duration than Galaxy S20, because it has a 4100mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S20, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.