Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-11-07 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, getting a 95.4 score against 71.7. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's design has the same thickness than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, but it's incredibly heavier. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the older 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features just a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a just a little higher count of pixels per inch of display, a really larger display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3088.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better camera than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited environments. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features much more memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.